Planet Carlton |
|||
Gentle Reader -- You are welcome to peruse my web-based journal. I assure you that my contributions to this medium will be both infrequent and inconsequential. Read on!
Awesome Loser (Molly's new site)
Scott's Blog Greg's New Blog IRS Tom Tomorrow Greedy Associates TWoP Kevin Drum Atrios DailyKos Rate Your Students KEXP Radio University Diaries Carlton Blogs Reading War and Peace Site Feed 02/01/2002 - 03/01/2002 03/01/2002 - 04/01/2002 04/01/2002 - 05/01/2002 05/01/2002 - 06/01/2002 06/01/2002 - 07/01/2002 07/01/2002 - 08/01/2002 08/01/2002 - 09/01/2002 09/01/2002 - 10/01/2002 10/01/2002 - 11/01/2002 11/01/2002 - 12/01/2002 12/01/2002 - 01/01/2003 01/01/2003 - 02/01/2003 02/01/2003 - 03/01/2003 03/01/2003 - 04/01/2003 04/01/2003 - 05/01/2003 05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003 06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 - 08/01/2003 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008 07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008 09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008 02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009 |
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
DON'T MEAN ANYTHING, BUT DON'T MEAN NOTHING, EITHER Ah, polls. I don't usually do any writing about polls, mostly because they involve numbers, and I barely passed 8th grade math (see below). This one is fun, however: (CBS) The latest CBS News poll finds President Bush's approval rating has fallen to an all-time low of 34 percent, while pessimism about the Iraq war has risen to a new high. And Cheney? In a bright spot for the administration, most Americans appeared to have heard enough about Vice President Dick Cheney's hunting accident. You sometimes hear people say that 20% of America will vote for anything. Well, Dick Cheney can't even scare up the yahoos and the cranks these days. I guess a shotgun blast to the face is a universal signifier. At 18%, the only contituency he's got left consists of recently awakened coma patients and the clones of himself that he's created to harvest for replacement organs (more than you'd think!). Only I am brave enough to ask these questions -- can the VP enter negative territory? At that point, does he leave the world of the politically living and become some kind of powerful undead politician, shambling across the National Mall by night, sustaining himself on the 'strong leader' numbers of the living? Will we hunt him with dogs? Will he at least appear on America's Most Wanted? [blank stare] Click to enlarge. QUOTE OF THE DAY Via University Diaries (at left) "While you were making your slides, we would be killing you." (Russian officer […] in a discussion between US and Russian officers serving in Bosnia as to who would have won if we had ever actually fought in Western Europe.) FLAMES, BURNING THE SIDE OF MY FACE . . . OK, so he wrote this back in 2004, and this guy is a first-rate pinhead anyway, and I would never have known about it if somebody at This Modern World hadn't compared it to something else more recent, but this quote from Fred Barnes made my teeth grind together: Should national unity prevail, Iraq's chances of becoming a stable democracy will improve dramatically. I'd like to see one other thing in Iraq, an outbreak of gratitude for the greatest act of benevolence one country has ever done for another. A grateful Iraqi heart would be a sign of a new Iraqi attitude and a signal of sure success. What really gets me about the quote is that I'm sure that there are a lot of people out there who feel just this way, who are still wondering why our troops weren't pelted with flowers and candy as they marched into Baghdad to privatize the Iraqi oil industry. I mean, it's one (dumb) thing to have thought that would happen before the invasion, but another (dumber) still to expect it after everything has gone to hell. (And I know, things weren't quite as FUBAR when Barnes was writing, but I'm reading it in the now, OK?) OK Fred, here's three reasons why you're never going to see that grateful Iraqi heart: 1. Nobody likes being invaded, as it turns out, even by us; 2. The Iraqis didn't ask us to invade them (I mean, Chalabi did, but he so doesn't count); and 3. We screwed it up. Bad. Worse than it was before, probably. But hey, Fred, I can tell that it's killing you that no one has thanked you, personally, for your support of this massive clusterfuck which has killed so many of them, quite a few of us, and cost us an incalculable amount in blood, money and reputation. Here's today (updated): Hundreds of unclaimed dead lay at the morgue at midday Monday -- blood-caked men who had been shot, knifed, garroted or apparently suffocated by the plastic bags still over their heads. Many of the bodies were sprawled with their hands still bound -- and many of them had wound up at the morgue after what their families said was their abduction by the Mahdi Army, the Shiite militia of cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. So thanks, Fred. Thanks a lot. Monday, February 27, 2006
PEANUT, WHAT IS THE FREQUENCY? I've been going to a gym for a few weeks now. It's near my work, and cheap, and it happens to be in a hotel. You have to go through the lobby and get on the hotel elevator with the guests, if any happen to be on at that time. Today, I got on the elevator with a woman, approx age: 38-42, dyed-red curly hair, stylishly (?) dressed mostly in black, of more or less average appearance. She was using her cell phone, which lost its signal as soon as the doors shut. We made eye contact and she shook her head to indicate frustration with the phone. "How's that working for you?" I said -- or something equally banal. "You know," she said. "There aren't any peanuts in my room. Wouldn't it be nice if there were some peanuts in my room?" "Uh, sure," I said, and got off at the floor with the gym. My question for all my many readers -- what was that all about? Is this some code that I'm not familiar with? GO ME
Actually, this was kinda challenging, and I guessed on one. Friday, February 24, 2006
ANNA AKHMATOVA This woman is a character in Vollmann's Europe Central, referenced below. A poet, she wrote about life under Stalin, was imprisoned, etc. Wikipedia article here. I'm not a poetry guy, usually (though more recently than ever, it seems like), but EC made me curious to read some of her work. Interesting anecdote: Akhmatova's early work inspired a generation of Russian women to write their own poetry (much of it quite bad, apparently). In response to this, she reportedly said: "I taught our women how to speak but don't know how to make them silent". The following two excerpts from Akhmatova's poem "Requiem" touched me -- the very first and last bits: INSTEAD OF A PREFACE Wednesday, February 22, 2006
COMMENTS With a bit of tinkering, I have fixed the comments (I hope). While they weren't broken, per se, the placement of the prompt was confusing. "Sharon" was the latest person to fall victim to the madness. Sorry, Sharon! In response to my poem commentary, she wrote: We're thinking about adopting your version as the official city poem of Hattiesburg. You're getting pretty hot on the local email trail. Good job. To which I reply: What? Monday, February 20, 2006
JUST A LITTLE ONE BEFORE BED A while back, I posted about reports that the White House was getting ready for impeachment hearings, and that such hearings were expected, seen as inevitable, could probably take out the Prez. That caused me to wonder -- WTF are these people thinking to be so blase about getting your man impeached? I had a couple of theories at the time, and here's a new one: the real power-brokers on the Right are ready to let Bush be destroyed. He was never anything but a straw-man anyway, and he is clearly nearing the end of his usefulness. So, let him go down and deflect the blame for the myriad failures of the government during his term onto him and him alone. If so, you'll be shocked at how quickly the hero-worship of the rank and file turns into derision and demands for retribution. It might be a little of this: "Comrades," he said quietly, "do you know who is responsible for this? Do you know the enemy who has come in the night and overthrown our windmill? SNOWBALL!" he suddenly roared in a voice of thunder. "Snowball has done this thing! In sheer malignity, thinking to set back our plans and avenge himself for his ignominious expulsion, this traitor has crept here under cover of night and destroyed our work of nearly a year. Comrades, here and now I pronounce the death sentence upon Snowball. 'Animal Hero, Second Class,' and half a bushel of apples to any animal who brings him to justice. A full bushel to anyone who captures him alive!" Or maybe a little of this: SPADE: Yes, I'm trying not to let that worry me. We'll come to the money Saturday, February 18, 2006
EUROPE CENTRAL I've been reading William Vollmann's Europe Central for a while now (it's quite the hefty tome) and I have to say that I'm engrossed. I don't know whether to call it historical fiction, as most of the characters are real people and most of the plot centers around real events, or whether it should more rightly be called a novelization of real events, or what. Still, if you're at all interested in Germany and Russia before and during World War II, and have some free time for reading, I recommend it. ONLY POSITIVE MISSISSIPPI SPOKEN HERE I felt a little bad for pooping all over the proposed poem for my home state. At the risk of embarassing myself, I dug out a poem I wrote on the subject, back when I did such things. In the interest of being fair, I post it here. I'm no poet, trust me, but it's short: Mississippi The world is small; it is named for a river We live there, and work, and pray for ourselves. The world is good; God watches us. He spits and nods his great big head. “That’s the way, boys,” he says. “You got it all right.” The world is simple; there is just the one book. We know how to read it. The world is small; outside Is a Gulf of infinite space. They say you can walk off the edge. But we wouldn’t, ever. 'FAIR USE,' WE HARDLY KNEW YE Via Kos and a couple of other blogs, I found this story, about how the RIAA (the recording industry trade association) are floating the idea that consumers shouldn't be able to copy music at all (from CDs to your iPod, from one CD to another, to your computer, etc.) Story here or here: In a recent filing, the RIAA had this to say: (all emphasis mine) Nor does the fact that permission to make a copy in particular circumstances is often or even routinely granted, necessarily establish that the copying is a fair use when the copyright owner withholds that authorization. In this regard, the statement attributed to counsel for copyright owners in the MGM v. Grokster case is simply a statement about authorization, not about fair use. What was the statement attributed to counsel (from the transcript of oral argument, evidently) in that case before the Supreme Court? "The record companies, my clients, have said, for some time now, and it's been on their website for some time now, that it's perfectly lawful to take a CD that you've purchased, upload it onto your computer, put it onto your iPod." One more, from the RIAA: Similarly, creating a back-up copy of a music CD is not a non-infringing use, for reasons similar to those the Register canvassed in detail in her 2003 determination that back-up copying of DVDs cannot be treated as noninfringing. While we recognize that access controls may in some circumstances affect copying, the fact remains that there is no general exception to the reproduction right to allow back-up copying (except the limited exception in § 117 for computer programs) and thus no justification for allowing circumvention of access controls for this purpose Is this the way we are going? You bought it, but it isn't yours? That appears to be what they want. How do you feel about it? SONG OF THE SOUTH OF HELL Scott lets me know that the state of Mississippi is just about to inaugurate a new state poem. Believe it or not, some people don't want this to be the state poem of Mississippi. I truly don't understand it. Here it is in its entirety: (with my comments) I Am Mississippi I don't understand the controversy. I believe that it represents all that is good and right about our fair state. (blank stare) Friday, February 17, 2006
ALL YOUR BATTLESTAR ARE BELONG TO US My show is back, thank the gods. It was gooood tonight. Space battles, a woman's right to choose, AND a hot new (still nameless) pilot with 30's 'do who got a few lines, so maybe she'll be back. That is all. SHRIMP DIANE We did St. V's day on the 15th this year, thanks to conflicting schedules. Just like last year, I made Shrimp Diane, a wonderful dish and about the only semi-complicated thing I can cook. (Having done it twice, however, it isn't that difficult.) Recipe here. A CHICKEN, A WATERMELON AND A RUBBER DUMMY See them get shot with a 28-gauge shotgun here. Via Kevin Drum, of course. Monday, February 13, 2006
BLAM! BLAM! BLAMMITY-BLAM BLAM! So Cheney shot a guy while hunting. In the face. With a shotgun. At close range. Sounds like a regrettable accident. It really does. I mean, nobody told the press for 24 hours, and they blamed the victim, but that's pretty much Cheney's MO all around. I'm not saying he's a class act, just that he probably didn't do anything terrible on purpose. Nope, probably just negligent, and yeah, reckless. And maybe arrogant. And, who knows, drunk? These things happen. (I don't even think this would qualify as depraved heart murder -- even if the fellow died, or if Cheney had a heart, bwahaha.) But I remembered reading something a while back about the kind of hunting Cheney likes: (I found a link to this at firedoglake) Monday's hunting trip to Pennsylvania by Vice President Dick Cheney in which he reportedly shot more than 70 stocked pheasants and an unknown number of mallard ducks at an exclusive private club places a spotlight on an increasingly popular and deplorable form of hunting, in which birds are pen-reared and released to be shot in large numbers by patrons. The ethics of these hunts are called into question by rank-and-file sportsmen, who hunt animals in their native habitat and do not shoot confined or pen-raised animals that cannot escape. The above appeared in 2003. Now, this isn't the kind of hunting the VP et al. were doing this weekend, or so I understand. But . . . this account might lead one to infer that Mr. Cheney is not always so, er, discriminating as to where he points his gun. Sunday, February 12, 2006
MAYBE 'ANGELS IN AMERICA'? Midwest town offended by (expurgated) high school production of Grease, cancels performances of The Crucible. Article here. Dr. Enderle said he did not base his decision to cancel "The Crucible," which was first reported by The Fulton Sun, a daily, just on the three complaints and the video. He also asked 10 people he knew whether the play crossed a line. All but one, he recalled, said yes. Note that Mr. Enderle had approved the script for Grease in advance. How could he know that it would later prove to be ideologically suspect and culturally treasonous? There is only one solution for this problem: fire the drama teacher. "How am I supposed to know what's appropriate when I don't have any written guidelines, and it seems that what was appropriate yesterday isn't appropriate today?" Ms. DeVore asked. The teacher said she had been warned that because of the controversy, the school board might not renew her contract for next year. If you have to ask, Comrade DeVore, you do not have the best interests of the community at heart. Monday, February 06, 2006
WHEN SCREENWRITERS ATTACK John Rogers has a bit to say about a conservative film critic's effort to show Hollywood's liberal leanings by analyzing Oscar nominees: Okay. Okay. Deep breaths. He's got to pull it out somehow. For chrissake, the man's got a PhD from Stanford and a philosophy degree from Yale. It cannot get worse. Sure, Jason Apuzzo has shown he is ignorant of how Hollywood business works; completely clueless on recent film and Oscar history; either an idiot or a hypocrite when it comes to the purpose of the very foundation he has set up; and revealed with, I must admit, breathtaking efficiency, he has no critical film analysis skills whatsoever. There is no way this can get any uglier. Oh, but it can. I wish I knew something about movies. (blank stare) Sunday, February 05, 2006
Friday, February 03, 2006
SOTU Q (AND A?) I caught just the merest smidgen of the Speech the other night, and even that I could have done without. One thing that did occur to me -- why do all those Democrats even GO to the speech? It's not mandated anywhere that the Prez has to give the speech in front of every member of Congress (plus Supreme Court justices and other worthies). It doesn't even have to be a speech at all. I'd have to think that the members have as much or more distaste as I do for the man -- why not boycott? Why not leave half the chamber empty -- except maybe for Lieberman? THAT would be some effective political theater. I know no one will answer this, because I am talking to myself here. But I wondered. SCIENCE MYSTERY FRIDAY Here's a puzzle (or a puddle, heh) for all you science geeks out there: When I was still living in Boston, I got it in my head that I needed to prepare an "emergency kit" of supplies in case, well, whatever. This was shortly before the Democratic National Convention in 2004 -- just to give some context. Anyway, I bought two gallon jugs of distilled water at the supermarket, along with a bunch of cans of this or that vegetable -- enough to get through a few days without leaving the house, say. I put them in a closet which we didn't use for much else, and for got about it. The energency never happened, and we never drank the water. In August of 2005, we sold the condo and moved out. I went to clear out the disaster kit (I made a nice veggie salad with all the canned goods), and discovered the mystery: The water was gone. Gone. The two plastic jugs were still there, but were split open, and empty, or mostly (moistly! Ha!) empty. I think one was empty and one had an inch or so of the water still in it. So what happened to the water? It could have frozen, I guess, and burst the jugs, and then just run out when it thawed. I don't THINK this was the case because 1) I don't think it ever got below freezing in my apartment (though it was a chilly apartment in a cold climate), and 2) I believe that my downstairs neighbors would have noticed if two gallons of water came running through the ceiling. And if they noticed, they would have said something -- trust me. Maybe it was animals -- mice, rats, squirrels? I don't like to think that it would be that, but I guess it could have been. I didn't see any other indicia of vermin in the apartment, however. Any thoughts? Maybe the postcard bandit snuck in and drank it all? Comments by: YACCS |